As the Indian cricket team resumes business in relatively
familiar conditions against ever-so-familiar opposition in a fairly meaningless
bi-lateral one-day series, the real question to ponder is not a cricketing one. It isn’t about India’s wafer-thin
bowling reserves or about finding viable middle-order replacements once Sachin
decides to ride off into the sunset. The mind can’t help overlook the current
Sri Lankan jaunt, the home test series against the Kiwis or even the impending
T20 World cup.
I, for one, find it hard to stop thinking about the decision
to revive cricketing ties against Pakistan towards the end of the year. It is
extraordinary that I, for once, find myself on the same side of any issue as
Sunil Gavaskar, who recently spoke against the decision to host Pakistan when
the probe into the 26/11 terror attacks drags on. Any mention of the
India-Pakistan series makes the mind wander back to that ghastly evening when a
group of militants opened fire on Mumbai. It was the act of extreme cowardice
by a few individuals so brainwashed by hatred that it’s hard to think of them
as human beings. No matter how much they try to deny it, all links point back
to the higher echelons of power in Islamabad.
Every few months, the guiltless face of one Kasab keeps doing
the rounds on social media as a constant reminder of the incompetence of
India’s judiciary system. The television and press in India are always happy to
play the instigators, doling out one senseless story after another in a bid to
milk the unholy cow to its full extent. However, the fact of the matter remains
that we are closing in on four years of the incident and are nowhere close to
getting to the bottom of the matter. The cricket romantic in me yearns to see
Sehwag take strike against Umar Gul, but to play a game of cricket while the
investigation continues seems insensitive not only to the people who lost dear
ones during that dark day, but to the entire nation as a whole.
Those in favor of the cricket talk about a separation of
cricket and politics – certainly a noble ideal and one that’s worth striving for,
but impractical in the real world. In that sort of world, we’d have a clear
divide between the metaphorical Church and State and civilians would be kept
out of battles between nations. However, we do not live in that world and it
would be nothing but extreme naïveté to believe otherwise. The minute those
terrorists crossed the Rubicon into a decidedly civilian world and committed
those atrocities, those lines have been blurred forever.
I too have read Rahul Bhattacharya’s heartwarming memoirs
from India’s 2003 tour to Pakistan and would very much like to see real peace
in the truest sense of the term prevail between the embattled nations in my
lifetime, and there are enough people on both sides of the border who share
this sentiment. However, a pattern has emerged over the last few decades where
an incident sparks fury, resentment and continued hostilities until both sides,
in an act of selective amnesia dawdle into an uncomfortable peace, only for
this entire cycle to repeat itself. You thought it was going to be different
this time. The last incident provoked so much strong emotion all over the world
that there was genuine hope that something real would be done about it but as
the fourth anniversary of the tragedy beckons, we find ourselves back at square
one.
I certainly don’t have the Silver Bullet solution to this
problem (and the solution must not involve bullets of any sort), but the act of
falling back into the familiar pattern of peace-war-peace hardly seems ideal. The
first step towards solving any problem, small or big, is the acceptance that
one exists. Resuming cricket or cultural ties of any sort would be turning a
blind eye to the problem and pretending that it will go away on its own. Refusing
the Pakistan cricket board in its current state of debt and turmoil would serve
not only as a firm political stance, but also as a form of economic sanction. However,
Indian cricket officials have time and again shown themselves to be greedy,
short-sighted and opportunistic and expecting any action that would deny them a
chance to fill up their coffers (and their pockets) would be delusional.
I’ll try and end this on a happier note. This could be the
defining season for Virat Kohli who seems determined to carve out a path for
himself in Indian cricket. Here’s also wishing Yuvraj Singh a happy and speedy
way back to playing the sport he loves. May the season begin!
No comments:
Post a Comment